Keenan v. O'Malley
| Elizabeth P. Keenan |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv00037 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| M David Weisman |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Kelly, Kathryn) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Weisman. The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's opening brief is due 30 days from the date the administrative record is filed, defendant's response is due 30 days thereafter, and plaintiff's reply is due 14 days after the response is filed. The Commissioner does not have to provide chambers with a paper copy of the administrative record unless the Court specifically requests it. Mailed notice (ao, ) |
| Filing 10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It is appearing that 24-CV-00037, Elizabeth P. Keenan v. Martin J. O'Malley, a Social Security case, is currently pending before the Hon. Beth W. Jantz; and It is further appearing that the Hon. M. David Weisman presided over case 22-CV-124, Elizabeth P. Keenan v. Kilolo Kijakazi; therefore It is hereby ordered that 24-CV-00037, Elizabeth P. Keenan v. Martin J. O'Malley, shall be reassigned to the Hon. M. David Weisman, pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(c). Signed by Executive Committee on 1/18/2024. (jj, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Beth W. Jantz, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/12/2024. (jj, )
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. This case will be sent to the Executive Committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court are stricken. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Kelly, Kathryn) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Kathryn Ann Kelly as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Kelly, Kathryn) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The parties should consult with each other by 1/17/2024 to determine whether they will consent to the reassignment of this case to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, they should file a joint statement of consent pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(a). Otherwise, the parties should contact the courtroom deputy to inform the Court that they do not consent. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 4 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (jcc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jcc, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth P. Keenan by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Elizabeth P. Keenan; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21479140. (Attachments: #1 ALJ decision)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keenan v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth P. Keenan | |
| Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Ann Kelly |
| Represented By: | AUSA - SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
