Hoye v. O'Malley
| Melissa M. Hoye |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv00050 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gabriel A Fuentes |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Strom, William) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The case has been reassigned to this Court on consent (doc. #11 ). Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. #3 ) is granted. In accordance with Local Rule 16.4, after the filing of the Administrative Record, the Court will set a briefing schedule. The parties are directed to review and comply with Judge Fuentes' standing orders for filing motions and/or proposed orders, which are available on Judge Fuentes' webpage located on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please note that no oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Further, the parties are invited, if they wish, to communicate any preferred pronouns for counsel or clients to the courtroom deputy, Lauren Knight, at 312-818-6514. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Steven C. Seeger no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 01/19/2024. (aee, )
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Based upon the filing of the joint consent (Dckt. No. #9 ), this case will be sent to the Executive Committee for reassignment to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of William McHenry Strom as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Strom, William) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court directs the parties to consider whether they would like to consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. A PDF version of the Magistrate Judge Consent Form is available on the Court's website. Counsel shall confer in good faith and shall file a joint statement by January 24, 2024 indicating if they will consent to proceed to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 6 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (jcc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jcc, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Melissa M. Hoye by Joseph Stephen Sellers (Sellers, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Melissa M. Hoye by Deborah Susan Spector (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Melissa M. Hoye for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Melissa M. Hoye; (Spector, Deborah) Modified on 1/3/2024 (aee, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hoye v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Melissa M. Hoye | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Stephen Sellers |
| Represented By: | Deborah Susan Spector |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | William McHenry Strom |
| Represented By: | AUSA - SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
