Smith v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
| Cynthia Smith |
| L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, Dabur International, Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd., Dabur USA Inc. and Namaste Laboratories, LLC |
| 1:2024cv00058 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-00058 Smith v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ). (ph, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cynthia Smith by John C. Enochs Notice of Appearance (Enochs, John) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cynthia Smith by Betsy J. Barnes Notice of Appearance (Barnes, Betsy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Barnes, Betsy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form Complaint filed by Cynthia Smith; $2,000,000. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21481601.(Barnes, Betsy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jcc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
