Rajput v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Muhammad Usman Rajput |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC |
| 1:2024cv00124 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey I Cummings |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Trans Union LLC(Carlton Robinson, Katherine) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. Defendant Trans Union to answer or otherwise plead by 2/27/24. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Trans Union LLC (Carlton Robinson, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Trans Union LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Unopposed) (Carlton Robinson, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Trans Union LLC by Katherine Elisabeth Carlton Robinson (Carlton Robinson, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Usman Rajput as to Trans Union LLC on 1/16/2024, answer due 2/6/2024. (Gomez, Octavio) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union LLC (ksr, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. On or before 3/11/24, the parties shall file a joint initial status report in accordance with the template available on the Court's website under the case management procedure titled "Initial Status Report for Newly Filed Cases." The parties shall also review all of the case management procedures and standing orders available on the Court's website. Initial tracking status hearing set for 3/22/24 at 9:00 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required and the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will review the parties' joint initial status report and enter further orders as appropriate. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Muhammad Usman Rajput by Octavio Gomez (Gomez, Octavio) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gomez, Octavio) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Muhammad Usman Rajput; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21488350.(Gomez, Octavio) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
