Eriksen v. O'Malley
| Blake J. Eriksen |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv00243 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey T Gilbert |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Martha M. Pacold no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/8/2024. Mailed notice (td, )
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Rosen, Jordan) |
| Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 3/22/2024, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether they agree to a remand and whether they consent to reassignment for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge. (rao, ) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Jordan Alexander Rosen as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Rosen, Jordan) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category Three). (lw, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Blake J. Eriksen by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Blake J. Eriksen; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21508287. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eriksen v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Blake J. Eriksen | |
| Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Jordan Alexander Rosen |
| Represented By: | AUSA - SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
