Sukumaran v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
MAJU SUKUMARAN |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and United States Department of Homeland Security |
1:2024cv00278 |
January 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John F Kness |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal" #6 . Because the Notice was filed before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed without prejudice consistent with the terms of the Notice and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (exr, ) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security (Press, Joshua) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Maju Sukumaran (Salata, Edyta) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maju Sukumaran as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 1/24/2024, answer due 3/25/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 1/24/2024, answer due 3/25/2024; United States Department of Homeland Security served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024 (Salata, Edyta) |
Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security (Oswald, Craig) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jcc, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcc, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (jcc, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MAJU SUKUMARAN by Edyta Salata (Salata, Edyta) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Salata, Edyta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by MAJU SUKUMARAN; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21513138. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Salata, Edyta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.