Burton v. Oak Point University et al
Plaintiff: Annie Burton
Defendant: Oak Point University, Eric Hernandez, Marilyn Pagan, Thomas Gamble and Theresa Scanlan
Case Number: 1:2024cv00295
Filed: January 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Franklin U Valderrama
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2024 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Thomas Gamble, Eric Hernandez, Oak Point University, Theresa Scanlan by Paulette A. Petretti (Petretti, Paulette)
March 1, 2024 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Thomas Gamble, Eric Hernandez, Oak Point University, Marilyn Pagan, Theresa Scanlan (axa, )
February 15, 2024 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff has paid the filing fee 9 . Plaintiff is responsible for serving Defendants with the Complaint and summons in this case consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Service must be performed by someone other than the plaintiff who is over 18 years old and must be accomplished within 90 days after the lawsuit was filed. Plaintiff is put on notice that Rule 4(m) requires the Complaint to be served within 90 days of it being filed unless the Court finds good cause to extend the date. The Court strongly encourages Plaintiff to consult the U.S. District Court Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program for legal assistance, information about which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Pages.aspx?/2+UWDbtVzCDq3Lu8BusuQ== or 312-435-5691. Emailed notice (axc).
February 12, 2024 Filing 10 COMPLAINT filed by Annie Burton; Jury Demand. (jj, )
January 23, 2024 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) 6 is denied without prejudice with leave to refile because it is implausible. Plaintiff avers that her last monthly take-home pay was $240 on 12/31/2023, which means her yearly income in 2023 was $2,880. Plaintiff also states that she has zero assets or other sources of money. It is not clear how Plaintiff paid for basic living necessities, if she truly had no sources of money apart from $240 per month. Plaintiff must provide accurate financial information for a full year, and if the responses on sources of money remains only $240 per month, which ended on 12/31/2023, then she must explain in writing on the application how she obtained living necessities. See Robie v. Thompson, No. 22-cv-06354, Dkt. 5 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 14, 2022) (declining to "accept the implausible claim that [Plaintiff] obtained the basic necessities of life during the portion of the past year when he was not in custody with no visible means of support. [Plaintiff] is placed on notice that the court gives pro se litigants wide latitude but will not overlook incorrect sworn information provided on forms designed to elicit basic financial information from unrepresented individuals."). If Plaintiff does not file an amended in forma pauperis application on or before 2/13/2024, this case may be dismissed. Emailed notice (axc).
January 17, 2024 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 03/26/2024 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc).
January 17, 2024 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, )
January 16, 2024 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (nsf, )
January 11, 2024 Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Annie Burton (nsf, )
January 11, 2024 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Annie Burton for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (nsf, )
January 11, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, )
January 11, 2024 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Annie Burton. (nsf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burton v. Oak Point University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annie Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oak Point University
Represented By: Paulette A. Petretti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Hernandez
Represented By: Paulette A. Petretti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marilyn Pagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Gamble
Represented By: Paulette A. Petretti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Scanlan
Represented By: Paulette A. Petretti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?