Roberts v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Diamond Roberts |
Progress Software Corporation, Delta Dental Plans Association, Delta Dental of California and Delta Dental of New York, Inc. |
1:2024cv00346 |
January 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC ACKNOWLEDGMENT : Case transferred from Illinois Northern has been opened in District of Massachusetts as case 1:24-cv-10589, filed 03/08/2024. (gcy, ) |
Filing 12 TRANSFERRED to the District of Massachusetts the the electronic record. (jj, ) |
Filing 11 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to District of Massachusetts. Mailed notice.(jj, ) |
Filing 10 TRANSFERRED to the District of Massachusetts the electronic record. (gcy, ) |
Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to District of Massachusetts. (gcy, ) |
***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to MDL 3083 Conditional Transfer Order filed 1/29/24. (gcy, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 3/21/24, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Roberts as to Delta Dental Plans Association on 1/24/2024, answer due 2/14/2024. (Siehl, Whitney) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Roberts as to Delta Dental of California on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Siehl, Whitney) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Roberts as to Delta Dental of New York, Inc. on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Siehl, Whitney) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Diamond Roberts. Progress Software Corporation waiver sent on 1/18/2024, answer due 3/18/2024. (Siehl, Whitney) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Delta Dental Plans Association, Delta Dental of California, Delta Dental of New York, Inc., Progress Software Corporation (axa, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (evw, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Diamond Roberts by Whitney Kendall Siehl (Siehl, Whitney) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Siehl, Whitney) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint filed by Diamond Roberts; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21520432. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Data Breach Notice Letter))(Siehl, Whitney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.