Miller v. Gonzalez et al
| Roxanne K Miller |
| Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres and The City of Chicago |
| 1:2024cv00383 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, The City of Chicago by Jessica L Griff (Griff, Jessica) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court strikes the status date set for 3/14/2024 and resets it to 11/12/2024 at 9:30 AM. The Court sets the following discovery schedule: Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due by 4/19/2024; written discovery to issue by 5/3/2024; and fact discovery closes on 11/8/2024. The parties should file a joint status report by 11/5/2024 indicating the status of fact discovery, the status of settlement discussions and whether the parties request a referral to the magistrate judge for settlement purposes, whether the parties require expert discovery prior to dispositive motion practice, and proposed schedules for expert discovery and summary judgment briefing, where applicable. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal #15 , the Court dismisses all claims against Defendant Eric Torres without prejudice and with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 17 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL by Roxanne K Miller (Kulis, Gregory) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, The City of Chicago(Meehan, Kevin) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Meehan, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres by Kevin Thomas Meehan (Meehan, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Defendants' motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #11 . Defendants' responsive pleadings are due by 3/1/2024. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Kevin Thomas Meehan for presentment of extension of time #11 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/14/2024 at 09:45 AM. (Meehan, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant The City of Chicago for extension of time (Meehan, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Kevin Thomas Meehan (Meehan, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 3/14/2024 at 1:30 PM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' website and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 3/7/2024. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (866) 434-5269, Access Code: 8087837. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll-free number). Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roxanne K Miller as to The City of Chicago on 1/16/2024, answer due 2/6/2024. (Orozco, Brian) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roxanne K Miller by Scott Patrick Granfeldt (Granfeldt, Scott) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roxanne K Miller by Kenneth Young Hurst (Hurst, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 Attorneys' Lien by Roxanne K Miller (Kulis, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roxanne K Miller by Gregory E. Kulis (Kulis, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roxanne K Miller by Brian M Orozco (Orozco, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Orozco, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Roxanne K Miller; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21525637.(Orozco, Brian) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The City of Chicago (ksr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
