Lena v. O'Malley
| Sommer Lena |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv00450 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Heather K McShain |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Claus, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: The case has been reassigned to this Court on consent #10 . Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice. (pk, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Heather K. McShain, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 2/08/2024.(jj, )
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: As the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings #8 , all deadlines and hearings set before this Court are stricken. This case will be reassigned. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Michael D. Claus as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Claus, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Should the parties elect to do so, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_online/ConsentForm_NEW_fillable_pdf.pdf. By 3/1/24, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether they agree to a remand and whether they consent to reassignment for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge. Status hearing set for 3/15/24 at 9:00 a.m. to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (gmm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gmm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (gmm, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Sommer Lena for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sommer Lena by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sommer Lena; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lena v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sommer Lena | |
| Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Claus |
| Represented By: | AUSA - SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
