Slowinski et al v. BlueTriton Brands, Inc.
| Christine Slowinski and David Haynes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| BlueTriton Brands, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00513 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE by David Haynes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Christine Slowinski to MOTION by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc. to dismiss #14 (Perry, Steven) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM by BlueTriton Brands, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss #14 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plus Plastic Text Orb Media, #2 Exhibit 2 - Synthetic Polymer Contamination in Bottled Water-00407)(Letourneau, Brienne) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc. to dismiss (Letourneau, Brienne) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The agreed motion for an extension of time and a briefing schedule (Dckt. No. #6 ) is hereby granted. The response to the complaint is due by February 26, 2024. A response is due by March 18, 2024, and a reply is due by April 1, 2024. The motion for leave to appear pro hac vice (Dckt. No. #12 ) is granted. Attorney Bryan Merryman is added as counsel for BlueTriton Brands, Inc. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21593792. (Merryman, Bryan) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: There is no need for a certificate of service for a court filing when all parties of record receive a copy through CM/ECF. Under the Local Rules, "[a] certificate of service is required only when service of a document filed on the Court's E-Filing system is made on a recipient who is not an E-Filer listed on the docket of the proceeding." See L.R. 5.5(a); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(B) ("No certificate of service is required when a paper is served by filing it with the court's electronic-filing system."). The Court handles service through CM/ECF. In effect, the CM/ECF header is the certificate of service. Save yourself the work, and the trouble. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by April 15, 2024. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs David Haynes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Christine Slowinski by Steven Gene Perry (Perry, Steven) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs David Haynes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Christine Slowinski by David B. Levin (Levin, David) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs David Haynes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Christine Slowinski by Todd M Friedman (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 6 AGREED MOTION by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc. to continue Deadline to File Responsive Pleading and Set Briefing Schedule. (Letourneau, Brienne) Docket Text Modified by the Clerk's Office on 1/24/2024 (jh, ). |
| Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to counsel of record. (gcy, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (jxm, ) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc. (Letourneau, Brienne) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc. by Brienne M Letourneau (Letourneau, Brienne) |
| Filing 2 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by BlueTriton Brands, Inc. (Letourneau, Brienne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from In The Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois, case number (2023LA001376) filed by BlueTriton Brands, Inc. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number BILNDC-21548131. (Attachments: #1 Errata A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Letourneau, Brienne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
