Sattar v. Flextronics International USA, Inc.
| Mohammed Abdul Sattar |
| Flextronics International USA, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00648 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Defendant's motion #11 to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim is briefed as follows: response due: 3/27/2024; reply due: 4/10/2024. The deadline of 3/29/2024 to file an initial status report is stricken. The court will rule by mail on defendant's motion #11 to dismiss for failure to state a claim and set a further date, if necessary, when it rules. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM by Flextronics International USA, Inc. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #11 (Ralph, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Ralph, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Flextronics International USA, Inc. by Samuel Mark Mitchell (Mitchell, Samuel) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement and Notification of Affiliates STATEMENT by Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Ralph, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Flextronics International USA, Inc. by Jennifer Lucia Ralph (Ralph, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mohammed Abdul Sattar as to Flextronics International USA, Inc. on 2/13/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. (Lampert, Travis) |
Filing 6
ORDER: An initial status report is due on or before March 29, 2024. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with the pretrial procedures in Judge Gottschall's case management packet, which is available from the court's website at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within 14 days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement prior to the filing of the first status report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f)(2). If, by the due date of the scheduled status report, defendants have not been served, plaintiff should send an email to the chambers email account, chambers_gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov, to reset the status date. Counsel in cases removed from another court should follow these procedures to the extent applicable. See the order and Judge Gottschall's case management packet for further details. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 1/29/2024. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
| Filing 5 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mohammed Abdul Sattar by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mohammed Abdul Sattar by Travis Phillip Lampert (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mohammed Abdul Sattar by Travis Phillip Lampert (Entered as CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lampert, Travis)) Modified on 1/26/2024 (lm, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mohammed Abdul Sattar; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21565387. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Lampert, Travis) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Flextronics International USA, Inc. (jcm) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mcp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mcp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sattar v. Flextronics International USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mohammed Abdul Sattar | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Represented By: | Travis Phillip Lampert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Flextronics International USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Lucia Ralph |
| Represented By: | Samuel Mark Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
