Elliott v. Chicago Transit Authority
| David Elliott |
| Chicago Transit Authority |
| 1:2024cv00668 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RECEIVED Amended Complaint and no copies by David Elliott. (Exhibits) (Received at the Intake Counter on 3/20/24.) (ph, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's "Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint" #11 . There is nothing in the body of the motion; Plaintiff does not indicate how much more time he needs or explain why he needs additional time. Nevertheless, the Court will allow Plaintiff an additional two weeks to file his amended complaint. Plaintiff's motion #11 is granted, and the amended complaint is now due by 3/20/24. Mailed notice. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff David Elliott for extension of time to file amended complaint. (Received via the Clerk's Office drop box on 3/5/24.) (ph, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER Plaintiff David Elliott filed a pro se complaint against his former employer, the Chicago Transit Authority ("CTA"), alleging employment discrimination under the American with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq. Elliott also filed motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") and for attorney representation. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Statement, Elliott's complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to file an amended complaint by 3/5/24. His motion for leave to proceed IFP #9 is denied as moot, and his motion for attorney representation #8 is denied without prejudice. If Elliott fails to submit his proposed amended complaint in compliance with this order, this case may be dismissed on the understanding that he is no longer interested in pursuing this case. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 2/6/2024. Mailed notice. (ags)
|
| Filing 9 APPLICATION by Plaintiff David Elliott for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ph, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff David Elliott for attorney representation. (ph, ) |
| MAILED and emailed copies of the correct forms to Plaintiff. (kp, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied without prejudice to refiling using the correct form for non-prisoner cases, available at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_online/IFP_nonPrisoner.pdf. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice to refiling using the correct form, available at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents /_forms/_online/motion_attorney_representation-fillable.pdf. The Clerk is directed to mail and email copies of the correct forms to Plaintiff. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (smb, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff David Elliott for attorney representation (smb, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff David Elliott for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (smb, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff David Elliott (smb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (smb, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by David Elliott (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Elliott v. Chicago Transit Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Elliott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chicago Transit Authority | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
