Lauras International (USA) LLP et al v. Hensley Consulting LLC et al
| Lauras International (USA) LLP and Lauras International Canada, Inc. |
| Hensley Consulting LLC, Ralph Todd Hensley and Timothy Pennix |
| 1:2024cv00881 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Timothy Pennix by Lawrence W. Byrne Atty. Caroline McAuliffe (Byrne, Lawrence) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Defendant Pennix's motion to join #18 is granted insofar as he joins the other defendants' motion to dismiss. All discovery is stayed. Plaintiff's motion for jurisdictional discovery is due 4/1/24 and defendants shall file a written response to the motion for jurisdictional discovery by 4/8/24. No reply is permitted unless requested by the court. The court will set a briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss after it resolves plaintiff's request for jurisdictional discovery. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant Timothy Pennix to join Motion to Dismiss Filed by Hensley Consulting LLC (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Timothy Pennix)(Byrne, Lawrence) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Timothy Pennix by Lawrence W. Byrne (Byrne, Lawrence) |
| Filing 16 STATUS Report Joint Status Report Under Rule 26(f) by Lauras International (USA) LLP, Lauras International Canada, Inc. (Chaban, Mitchell) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendants Ralph Todd Hensley, Hensley Consulting LLC to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Cornell, Trent) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendants Ralph Todd Hensley, Hensley Consulting LLC to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Cornell, Trent) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable John F. Kness for all further proceedings pursuant to IOP13(d). Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (smb, ) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiffs Lauras International (USA) LLP, Lauras International Canada, Inc. regarding Summons served on Timothy Pennix on 03/07/2024 (Chaban, Mitchell) |
| ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant Timothy Pennix. (jcc,) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motions for leave to appear pro hac vice #10 #11 are granted. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21669322. (Mayfield, Logan) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21669023. (Owen, David) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #8 is granted. Defendants Hensley and Hensley Consulting have until 3/25/24 to respond to the complaint. By 3/27/24, the parties shall file a joint initial status report, which should include a proposal for briefing any motions to dismiss. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendants Ralph Todd Hensley, Hensley Consulting LLC for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint (Cornell, Trent) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Ralph Todd Hensley, Hensley Consulting LLC by Trent P. Cornell (Cornell, Trent) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiffs Lauras International (USA) LLP, Lauras International Canada, Inc. regarding Summons served on Ralph Todd Hensley on 02/09/2024 (Chaban, Mitchell) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Ralph Todd Hensley, Timothy Pennix (khg, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lauras International (USA) LLP, Lauras International Canada, Inc. by Joseph Anthony Laplaca (Laplaca, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT of Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21592324. (Chaban, Mitchell) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (ksr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ksr, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lauras International (USA) LLP, Lauras International Canada, Inc. by Mitchell S. Chaban (Chaban, Mitchell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Chaban, Mitchell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lauras International (USA) LLP, Lauras International Canada, Inc.; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6)(Chaban, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
