Adams v. City of Chicago et al
| Robert Christopher Adams and Miles |
| City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and Jane Doe |
| 1:2024cv01124 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeremy C Daniel |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Robert Christopher Adams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (Received by Clerk's Office Mail Room on 3/21/24). (gcy, ) |
| MAILED a blank IFP application and Order dated 2/15/2024 to Plaintiff. (jh, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee confined at the Cook County Jail, initiated this 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights action, but neither paid the $405 filing fee upfront, nor submitted a completed in forma pauperis (IFP) application to pay the fee with monthly deductions from his jail trust fund account. His submission of a statement of his account #3 , by itself, does not suffice. See N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.3(a), (c). By March 8, 2024, Plaintiff must either prepay the $405 filing fee or submit a completed IFP application. His failure to comply will result in summary dismissal of this case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to mail an IFP application to Plaintiff. Signed by the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 2/15/2024. Mailed notice (jh, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: #Local Rule 3.3# requires that any document submitted for filing for which a filing fee is required must be accompanied either by the appropriate fee or an In Forma Pauperis Application and Financial Affidavit. No filing fee or IFP petition was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Robert Christopher Adams is directed to pay the required filing fee or submit a completed #In Forma Pauperis Application and Financial Affidavit# within 15 days of this notification. Pursuant to LR 3.3(f), failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the action by the assigned judge. Signed by the Executive Committee. (jh, )
|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form and the Local Rule 3.3 New case no payment or IFP to the Plaintiff Robert Christopher Adams. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER Trust Fund Account Statement. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Robert Christopher Adams. (Envelope Postmarked 2/5/2024) (jh, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
