Thomas v. United States of America
| Carl E Thomas |
| United States of America |
| 1:2024cv01160 |
| February 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 2/13/2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff Carl Thomas filed this action seeking to set aside a default judgment in Case 00-cv-127 under FRCP 60(b)(1), (2), (3) and (6). [Dkt. 1, 6]. FRCP 60(c) states that any motion for relief from a final judgment "must be made within a reasonable timeand for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding." The wage garnishment at issue in Case 00-cv-127 was issued in June 2001, nearly 23 years ago. Under no circumstances is this matter timely filed, so the case is dismissed without prejudice. All pending motion are terminated. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (jlj, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by Carl E Thomas. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Carl E Thomas to set aside default judgment. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Carl E Thomas for attorney representation. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Carl E Thomas for leave to proceed in forma pauperis an affidavit. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Carl E Thomas. (Attchments). (gcy, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl E Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
