Washington v. Adams
| Terron Darnell Washington |
| Candice Faith Adams |
| 1:2024cv01219 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| P.I.: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: On 3/6/2024, the Court ordered plaintiff to either file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405 filing fee or his case would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Plaintiff has not done either. The Court dismisses this matter for want of prosecution. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. The Court notes that plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is to pay the $405 filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by 3/31/2024 or the Court may dismiss the matter for want of prosecution. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Terron Darnell Washington. (ph, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ph, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Terron Darnell Washington. (Exhibits) (Envelope not postmarked) (ph, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. FEE DUE, NO IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Washington v. Adams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terron Darnell Washington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Candice Faith Adams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
