Wilhelm v. Plaid, Inc.
Candice Wilhelm |
Plaid, Inc. |
1:2024cv01242 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
LaShonda A Hunt |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendant Plaid Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 is taken under advisement. The motion does not include a proposed briefing schedule. The Court therefore sets the following schedule: Plaintiff's response in opposition is due by 4/23/24 and Defendant's reply in support is due by 5/7/24. The Court will rule by mail. No appearance is necessary on 3/28/24. The 4/9/24 initial status report deadline and 4/16/24 telephonic status hearing are stricken. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Harnaik Kahlon for presentment of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, #10 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 3/28/2024 at 10:00 AM. (Kahlon, Harnaik) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Plaid, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, #10 and failure to state a claim (Kahlon, Harnaik) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Plaid, Inc. to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Alain Meier, #2 Declaration of Blake Kolesa, #3 Exhibit A - Declaration of Candice Wilhelm (Jan. 19, 2024), #4 Exhibit B - Plaid Inc.'s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, #5 Exhibit C - Order, Shah v. Plaid (N.D. Ill. July 17, 2023) (Wood, J.))(Kahlon, Harnaik) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendant Plaid, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead #7 is granted. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due by 3/25/24. No appearance is necessary on 3/7/24. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Harnaik Kahlon for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #7 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 3/7/2024 at 10:00 AM. (Kahlon, Harnaik) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Plaid, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or otherwise plead in response to the complaint (Kahlon, Harnaik) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Plaid, Inc. by Blake James Kolesa (Kolesa, Blake) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Plaid, Inc. by John Kenneth Theis (Theis, John) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Plaid, Inc. by Harnaik Kahlon (Kahlon, Harnaik) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Initial Status Report for New Case by 4/9/24. A template for the report can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage under "Initial Status Conference." A telephonic initial status hearing is set for 4/16/24, at 9:30 AM. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: 877-336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media may call in to listen to the hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting court proceedings. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Candice Wilhelm by Michael Louis Fradin (Fradin, Michael) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (jxm, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Plaid, Inc. (jcc,) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Candice Wilhelm; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21637290. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fradin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilhelm v. Plaid, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Candice Wilhelm | |
Represented By: | Michael Louis Fradin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Plaid, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Blake James Kolesa |
Represented By: | Harnaik Kahlon |
Represented By: | John Kenneth Theis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.