Koprowski v. Grochocki
Eugene J. Koprowski |
Laura A Grochocki and Laura Grock |
1:2024cv01260 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: In view of the Court's 2/21/24 order denying the petition for Rule 27 deposition (doc. #7 ), and giving plaintiff through 3/13/24 to refile such petition, the magistrate notes that no refiling occurred, and no objection was filed to the 2/21/24 order within the 14 days allowed by Rule 72. Accordingly, the magistrate judge terminates the referral and recommends to the district court that it terminate the case. Judge Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes no longer referred to the case. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) |
MAILED copy of order dated 4/5/24 (doc. #8 ) to Plaintiff Eugene J. Koprowski. (lxk, ) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter coming before the Court on referral including supervision of discovery (doc. #5 ), and with the Rule 27 petition for deposition to perpetuate testimony (doc. #1 ) being a request for discovery, the petition is denied without prejudice for failure to state grounds for the requested relief, for the reasons stated in the accompanying order. Enter Order. Petitioner is granted 21 days to refile, if petitioner chooses to do so, and if no amended petition is on file through and including 5 p.m. on 3/13/24, the Court expects to notify the district court for its consideration of whether to terminate the case, all discovery having concluded. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) |
MAILED copy of orders dated 2/21/24 (doc. #s #6 , #7 ) to Plaintiff Eugene J. Koprowski. (lxk, ) |
Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for All Discovery Motions, Discovery Supervision, and Settlement Conference. Signed by Executive Committee on 2/16/2024. (aee, ) Modified on 2/20/2024 (aee, ). |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's Rule 27 petition for a deposition to perpetuate testimony #1 is referred to Magistrate Judge Fuentes. Emailed notice (axc). |
MAILED copy of Minute Entry #4 to Plaintiff Eugene J. Koprowski. (axc). |
***Civil Case Terminated. (daj, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 5). (daj, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, ) |
MAILED CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), Consent form to Eugene J. Koprowski. (daj, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (daj, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for a Rule 27 deposition to perpetuate testimony by Eugene J. Koprowski. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.