Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. et al v. Ninja Trading Inc. et al
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC. and Nutraax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc. |
NINJA TRADING INC. and Daniel Bekavac |
1:2024cv01283 |
February 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service of Summons and Complaint on Ninja Trading Inc. by service upon the Illinois Secretary of State (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., Nutraax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc. as to Daniel Bekavac on 3/2/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., Nutraax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc. as to Ninja Trading Inc. on 3/2/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #8 is granted. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Nutraax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. by Jason Demian Rosenberg (Rosenberg, Jason) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21694489. (Gunn, Uly) |
Filing 7 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jh, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Daniel Bekavac, NINJA TRADING INC. (mcp, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mek,) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mek) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC., Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. by A Colin Wexler (Wexler, A) |
Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC., Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC., Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC., Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. by Robert Douglas Leighton (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES filed by Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21641134. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(Leighton, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.