Virgil C. Stephens v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| Virgil C. Stephens |
| The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 1:2024cv01380 |
| February 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Nancy L Maldonado |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Virgil C. Stephens as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 4/5/2024, answer due 4/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service, Keith A. Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (jmv, ) |
Filing 16
ORDER for leave to conduct expedited discovery and service of process by email and/or electronic publication. Signed by the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado on 3/28/2024.(ca, )
|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery and for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) 13 . Plaintiff's motion is granted because the Court agrees expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendant and its accounts, in order to preserve assets for any potential judgment, and electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process as it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendant. See, e.g., Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified in Schedule "A", No. 20-CV-05049, 2021 WL 2894166, at *5 (N.D. Ill. July 9, 2021) (finding electronic service proper in similar circumstances). Enter Order. (ca, ) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in support of 13 Exparte motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #3 Exhibit 1, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration, #4 Exhibit 2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 12 [Amended] Schedule A to Complaint #1 and Schedule A #2 by Virgil C. Stephens (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 11 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (daj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (axa, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axa, ) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Christopher Romero (Romero, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Monica Rita Martin (Martin, Monica) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre (Mcintyre, Cameron) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Virgil C. Stephens Schedule A to Complaint #1 (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Virgil C. Stephens ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21651254. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Virgil C. Stephens v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Virgil C. Stephens | |
| Represented By: | Yi Bu |
| Represented By: | Keith A. Vogt |
| Represented By: | Adam Grodman |
| Represented By: | Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| Represented By: | Christopher Romero |
| Represented By: | Monica Rita Martin |
| Represented By: | Yanling Jiang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
