Branch, Jr. v. Trans Union, LLC
| Richard Branch, Jr. |
| Trans Union, LLC |
| 1:2024cv01465 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:Motion to appear pro hac vice #14 is granted. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21829637. (Richards, Nicola) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The parties report they are engaged in preliminary settlement discussions so the motion to extend #12 is granted. The April 22, 2024 initial status #7 hearing is stricken (as is the due date for the initial status report). No responsive pleading need be filed at this time. Instead, the parties are to file a short status report by April 25, 2024 that reports on the progress of their settlement efforts, unless a stipulation of dismissal is filed sooner. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Richard Branch, Jr. for extension of time for Initial Conference and Status Report. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Richard Branch, Jr.. Trans Union, LLC waiver sent on 2/23/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Trans Union, LLC (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Trans Union, LLC by Laura K. Rang (Rang, Laura) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Trans Union, LLC by Camille R Nicodemus (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In person initial status hearing set for April 22, 2024 at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 2119. Initial Status Report shall be filed by April 17, 2024. The report should comply with the requirements set forth in the Initial Status Report standing order, which can be found at Judge Jenkins's web page @ (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov, "District Judges", to "Judge Lindsay Jenkins", to "Initial Status Hearings" under Case Management Procedures"). The parties must follow all the standing orders for Judge Jenkins and all Local Rules, which can be found at the same web page. At the Initial Status hearing, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; and (3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Richard Branch, Jr. by Craig B Sanders (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Trans Union, LLC (mcp, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Richard Branch, Jr. by Craig B Sanders (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Richard Branch, Jr. by Craig B Sanders (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Branch, Jr.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21662594.(Sanders, Craig) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mek) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Branch, Jr. v. Trans Union, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Branch, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Represented By: | Nicola C Richards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trans Union, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Laura K. Rang |
| Represented By: | Camille R Nicodemus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
