Jackson v. Markham
| Sammie Jackson |
| City of Markham |
| 1:2024cv01596 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed the parties' notice of settlement #16 , which informs the Court that the parties in this case and in related case no. 24-cv-725, Carson v. City of Markham, have reached a settlement. By 6/3/2024, the parties are directed to file (i) the appropriate dismissal paperwork or (ii) a status report explaining the delay. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Settlement STATEMENT by City of Markham (Marderosian, Steven) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Defendant's motion for extension of time to file its answer or other responsive pleading #14 . Defendant's answer is now due by 4/19/2024. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant City of Markham for extension of time to file answer (Marderosian, Steven) |
| Filing 13 REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-21678257, for inadvertent duplicate filing. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exs 1 - 3 to Request for Refund)(Marderosian, Steven) #10 (td, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, and as supported by the attached exhibits, the Court grants Defendant's request for the Clerk of Court to refund filing fee #10 . The Clerk of Court is instructed to refund to Defendant's counsel, Steven A. Marderosian, of Eydie R. Glassman Esq Legal and Consulting Services LLC, 10 S Riverside Plaza, Suite 875, Chicago, IL 60606 the $405 petition for removal filing fee charged under Receipt No. AILNDC-21678257. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court is in receipt of the declaration from Defendant's counsel, which avers compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) regarding its Petition for Removal to Federal Court #9 , in accordance with the Court's minute entry of 3/1/2024 #8 . Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-21678257, for inadvertent duplicate filing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exs 1 - 3 to Request for Refund)(Marderosian, Steven) |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of City of Markham re Service of Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 to Declaration, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 to Declaration)(Marderosian, Steven) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendant's petition for removal to federal court #1 , as well as the State Court docket #5 and Complaint [1-2]. From the information in the petition for removal and the attached state court records, it appears that Plaintiff alleges claims brought under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments for false arrest and violation of Plaintiff's Miranda rights. Accordingly, it appears that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and removal was therefore proper under 28 U.S.C. 1441(c)(1)(A). However, under 28 U.S.C. 1446(d), "[p]romptly after the filing of such notice of removal of a civil action the defendant... shall give written notice thereof to all adverse parties and shall file a copy of the notice with the clerk of such State court." Nothing before the Court indicates that Defendant has given Plaintiff or the State Court clerk notice of the removal. Accordingly, by 3/7/2024, Defendant or its counsel is directed to file a declaration on the docket notifying the Court that notice has been given to Plaintiff and to the State Court. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 05/13/2024, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) by that date, the removing party's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of notice of removal by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gmm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (gmm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT by Defendant City of Markham State Court Docket Exhibit 3 regarding complaint #1 (Glassman, Eydie) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Markham by Eydie Rachel Glassman, I (Glassman, Eydie) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Markham by Steven A. Marderosian Steven A Marderosian (Marderosian, Steven) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Markham by Steven A. Marderosian Eydie R Glassman (Marderosian, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal of Federal Question filed by City of Markham; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21678266. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Marderosian, Steven) Modified on 2/27/2024 (emc, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Markham | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sammie Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Markham | |
| Represented By: | Eydie Rachel Glassman, I |
| Represented By: | Steven A. Marderosian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
