Khan v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Ayesha Banu Khan |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng |
1:2024cv01615 |
February 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jeffrey I Cummings |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal #7 , which is self-effectuating under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). All pending deadlines and hearings are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Press, Joshua) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. On or before 4/29/24, the parties shall file a joint initial status report in accordance with the template available on the Court's website under the case management procedure titled "Initial Status Report for Newly Filed Cases." The parties shall also review all of the case management procedures and standing orders available on the Court's website. Initial tracking status hearing set for 5/10/24 at 9:00 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required and the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will review the parties' joint initial status report and enter further orders as appropriate. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jxm, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ayesha Banu Khan by Gretchen Heinzmann Ekerdt (Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ayesha Banu Khan; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21680629.(Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.