VantageScore Solutions, LLC v. Fair Isaac Corporation
| VantageScore Solutions LLC |
| Fair Isaac Corporation |
| 1:2024cv01634 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 40.4. Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/11/2024. (smb, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: This order is posted in both 20-cv-2114 and 24-cv-1634. FICO's motion to reassign the subpoena motion is granted given that the subpoena was issued for this case. The Court recommends to the Executive Committee that it reassign VantageScore Solutions, LLC v. Fair Isaac Corporation, No. 1:24-cv-01634, to Judge Chang's calendar as a related case. For the sake of convenience, going forward, all filings shall be posted on the docket of 20-cv-2114. VantageScore shall refile R. 1 (and its attachments) on the docket of 20-cv-2114, and shall file an appearance on the docket of 20-cv-02114. The agreed-on response deadline for FICO of 03/13/2024, R. 264 at 5, para. 13, is adopted. VantageScore's reply is due on 03/27/2024. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Fair Isaac Corporation (Provance, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Fair Isaac Corporation by Joshua W. Eastby (Eastby, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Fair Isaac Corporation by Matthew David Provance (Provance, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 MAILED Rule 83.15 letter to counsel of record. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 7 RECEIVED from California Northern; Case Number 4:24-mc-80033 (gcy) |
Filing 6
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #5 Stipulation Extending Time and Transferring Case to the Northern District of Illinois. Signed 2/27/2024. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/27/2024.]
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena, (Extending Time for Fair Isaac Corporation to Respond to VantageScore Solutions, LLC's Motion to Quash and Transferring Case to the Northern District of Illinois) filed by Fair Isaac Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Mancall-Bitel ISO Stipulation)(Mancall-Bitel, Sophia) (Filed on 2/26/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/27/2024.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sophia Morris Mancall-Bitel (Mancall-Bitel, Sophia) (Filed on 2/26/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/27/2024.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Weibell (Weibell, Anthony) (Filed on 2/26/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/27/2024.] |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/27/2024.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA against Fair Isaac Corporation ( Filing fee $ 52, receipt number ACANDC-19127160.). Filed by VantageScore Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Laura A. Stoll, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stoll, Laura) (Filed on 2/14/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 2/27/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
