DeBerry et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Brandon DeBerry and Sara DeBerry |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
1:2024cv01644 |
February 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jeremy C Daniel |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The defendant's motion for an extension of time #11 is granted. The defendant shall answer or otherwise plead on or before May 14, 2024. Mailed notice. (jg, ) |
Filing 13 Amended NOTICE of Motion by Dambi Kim for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #11 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 4/25/2024 at 09:30 AM. (Kim, Dambi) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Dambi Kim for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #11 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 4/24/2024 at 09:30 AM. (Kim, Dambi) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Second Unopposed) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kim, Dambi) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The defendant's motion for an extension of time #8 is granted. The defendant shall answer or otherwise plead on or before April 23, 2024. The motion hearing set for 4/2/2024 is stricken. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Dambi Kim for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 4/2/2024 at 09:30 AM. (Kim, Dambi) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Unopposed) (Kim, Dambi) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. by Dambi Kim (Kim, Dambi) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. by Christopher Mair (Mair, Christopher) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. by Michael Renee Cedillos (Cedillos, Michael) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (gmm, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brandon DeBerry, Sara DeBerry by Larry Paul Smith (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brandon DeBerry, Sara DeBerry by David M. Marco (Marco, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marco, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Brandon DeBerry, Sara DeBerry; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21683115.(Marco, David) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.