Bolotin v. Apotex Corp.
Plaintiff: Bridgett Bolotin
Defendant: Apotex Corp.
Case Number: 1:2024cv01686
Filed: February 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 Filing 17 MOTION by Plaintiff Bridgett Bolotin for leave to file First Amended Complaint Instanter (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Notice of Motion)(Mertz, Michael)
March 28, 2024 Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendant Apotex Corp.'s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) #12 : Plaintiff's response is due by 4/18/2024. Defendant's reply is due by 5/2/2024. Ruling before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 5/30/2024 at 9:30 a.m. The Scheduling Conference set for 4/29/2024 and its Rule 26(f) planning report are stricken pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss. Mailed notice. (pmh)
March 27, 2024 Filing 15 DECLARATION of Christopher T. Vazquez regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #12 , memorandum in support of motion #14 (Vazquez, Christopher)
March 27, 2024 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Apotex Corp. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #12 (Vazquez, Christopher)
March 27, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Christopher T. Vazquez for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #12 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 4/3/2024 at 09:45 AM. (Vazquez, Christopher)
March 27, 2024 Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Apotex Corp. (Vazquez, Christopher)
March 20, 2024 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bridgett Bolotin by Michael Thomas Mertz and Clint Tappero Pierce (Mertz, Michael)
March 20, 2024 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bridgett Bolotin by Michael Thomas Mertz (Mertz, Michael)
March 6, 2024 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Defendant's agreed motion to extend deadline to respond to Complaint #7 is granted to 3/27/2024. Scheduling Conference is set for 4/29/2024 at 9:45 a.m. (to track the case only; no appearance is required). The joint Rule 26(f) planning report is due 4/22/2024. (The form of the report can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.) The court will enter a schedule based on the report. Mailed notice. (pmh)
March 5, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Christopher T. Vazquez for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply #7 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 3/7/2024 at 09:45 AM. (Vazquez, Christopher)
March 4, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Apotex Corp. for extension of time to file response/reply Agreed Motion To Extend Deadline To Respond To Complaint (Vazquez, Christopher)
March 4, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE by Christopher T. Vazquez of Change of Address (Vazquez, Christopher)
February 29, 2024 Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (smb, )
February 29, 2024 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, )
February 29, 2024 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, )
February 28, 2024 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Apotex Corp. (Vazquez, Christopher)
February 28, 2024 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Apotex Corp. by Christopher T. Vazquez (Vazquez, Christopher)
February 28, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vazquez, Christopher)
February 28, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court Of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2023L012712) filed by Apotex Corp. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21688928. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Vazquez, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bolotin v. Apotex Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bridgett Bolotin
Represented By: Clint Tappero Pierce
Represented By: Michael Thomas Mertz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apotex Corp.
Represented By: Christopher T. Vazquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?