UNIFIED CML, LLC et al v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company et al
| UNIFIED CML, LLC and UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC |
| Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company and Republic Franklin Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv01915 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by UNIFIED CML, LLC, UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company waiver sent on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024; Republic Franklin Insurance Company waiver sent on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024. (Goodman, David) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiffs UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC, UNIFIED CML, LLC regarding Summons and Complaint served on Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company on 3/19/24 (Goodman, David) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC, UNIFIED CML, LLC by Christopher Stephen Hoffmann (Hoffmann, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC, UNIFIED CML, LLC by Nathan Pear Karlsgodt (Karlsgodt, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC, UNIFIED CML, LLC by Kalli Kling Nies (Nies, Kalli) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, Republic Franklin Insurance Company (jxm, ) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Maureen Mulroy, Utica National Ins. Co. for Graphic Arts Mutual Ins. Co. and Republic-Franklin Insurance Co. on 3/11/24 by Plaintiffs UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC, UNIFIED CML, LLC. Waiver of service due by 4/10/2024. (Goodman, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC, UNIFIED CML, LLC (Goodman, David) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 5/16/2024, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jmv, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jmv, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Goodman, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by UNIFIED CML, LLC, UNIFIED CML OPERATIONS, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21716202. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Goodman, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
