Rubini v. Greene et al
| Jacob A Rubini |
| Warden Brittany Greene and Brittany Greene |
| 1:2024cv01943 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Petitioner's motion #12 concerning the request for additional time is denied. Petitioner's habeas petition raises 14 grounds for relief, and it is not unusual for a party to a habeas petition might seek additional time to respond. Respondent's request was made in good faith and supported by a reasonable explanation for the need for more time, so the Court, in its discretion, permitted Respondent additional time to file its response. Petitioner's reply is now due by June 18, 2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Petitioner Jacob A Rubini to deny Respondents motion for extension of time. (Attachment). (Received by PC Scan on 4/19/24). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Respondent's motion for an extension of time #10 is granted. Respondent's response to the petition is now due by May 28, 2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Respondent Brittany Greene for extension of time (1st) (Walker, Steven) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Petitioner has filed a motion to dismiss the criminal charges #8 , arguing that this Court should dismiss the indictment returned against him based on prosecutorial misconduct. The motion is denied. This Court has no authority to dismiss an indictment filed in state court by state authorities. Petitioner's habeas corpus petition states that he has already been convicted of the crimes at issue, so dismissal of charges on which Petitioner has already been convicted is not appropriate or permissible. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Petitioner Jacob A Rubini to dismiss criminal charges. (Received by PC Scan on 4/15/24). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Brittany Greene by Steven Luther Walker (Walker, Steven) |
|
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. Petitioner's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. See attached Order for further details. The Clerk is instructed to update the docket to reflect that Respondent Brittany Greene is the Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center. Respondent is directed to answer or otherwise respond to the habeas corpus petition #1 by April 23, 2024. Petitioner's reply is due by May 14, 2024. Petitioner is instructed to file all future papers concerning this action with the Clerk of Court, c/o Prisoner Correspondence. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Petitioner Jacob A Rubini for attorney representation. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Jacob A Rubini for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Jacob A Rubini against Brittany Greene. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.