I Pee Holding, LLC v. Joyin Inc.
| I Pee Holding, LLC |
| Joyin Inc. |
| 1:2024cv01983 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of Claims Involving Patent STATEMENT by I Pee Holding, LLC IPH Notice of Claims Involving Patent (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC Exhibit F to complaint (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC Exhibit E to complaint (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC Exhibit D to complaint (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC Exhibit C to complaint (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC Exhibit B to complaint (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC for leave to file Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Exhibits B-F to Complaint Under Seal (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by I Pee Holding, LLC (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff I Pee Holding, LLC by Joseph Lawrence Cohen (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cohen, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by I Pee Holding, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number BILNDC-21724003. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-F (filed under seal))(Cohen, Joseph) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Joyin Inc. (evw,) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (jmv, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jmv, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: I Pee Holding, LLC v. Joyin Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: I Pee Holding, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Lawrence Cohen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joyin Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
