Yu v. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Hua Yu |
| The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director Kenneth S. Madsen |
| 1:2024cv02212 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing set for 5/17/2024 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hua Yu (LI, Rui) |
| Filing 8 STATUS Report by Hua Yu (LI, Rui) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hua Yu as to All Defendants. (LI, Rui) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kenneth S. Madsen, The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kenneth S. Madsen, The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Status hearing is set for 5/17/2024 at 10:00 AM as an in-person hearing. Plaintiff(s) is directed to advise the defendant(s) of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If the parties agree to consent jurisdiction before the Magistrate Judge, all parties must sign the consent form and electronically file the signed form on the case docket. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hua Yu by Rui LI (LI, Rui) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (LI, Rui) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Hua Yu; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21759194. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-4)(LI, Rui) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (vkm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Kenneth S. Madsen, The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jmv, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (vkm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
