International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 1:2024cv02387
Filed: March 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division to strike amended complaint #2 Attachment "Exhibit A" which was filed in error (Mckinley, Shawn)
March 25, 2024 Filing 3 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division regarding amended complaint #2 (Mckinley, Shawn)
March 25, 2024 Filing 2 AMENDED complaint by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division against Union Pacific Railroad Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Mckinley, Shawn)
March 25, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21779019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet)(Mckinley, Shawn)
March 25, 2024 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ksr, )
March 25, 2024 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (ksr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Represented By: Shawn Mckinley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?