VARGAS v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
| MELODY VARGAS |
| OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY |
| 1:2024cv02680 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sunil R Harjani |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: An initial status hearing is set for 6/12/2024 at 9:15 a.m. by telephone. By 6/5/2024, the parties shall file a joint initial status report with the content described in the Joint Initial Status Report Requirements found on the Court's web page. If the defendant(s) have not been served by the initial status date, counsel for plaintiff is to contact the Courtroom Deputy to reschedule the status hearing and the date for filing an initial status report. If plaintiff is seeking a default, no status report is required. In some cases, the scheduled initial status hearing may take place before a defendant has responded to the plaintiff's complaint. The Court expects all defendants who have been served with process to participate in the scheduling conference even if they have not yet responded to the complaint. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276#. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice (lxs, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Nsemo, Edet) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY by Christopher Thomas Gardino (Gardino, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY by Edet David Nsemo (Nsemo, Edet) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Nsemo, Edet) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, Illinois, case number (2024L001626) filed by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21816839. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nsemo, Edet) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (ksr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: VARGAS v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MELODY VARGAS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Thomas Gardino |
| Represented By: | Edet David Nsemo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
