Carrasco v. Department of the Treasury et al
| Hector Arevalo Carrasco |
| Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2024cv02717 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: On the Court's own motion, the Clerk's Office is directed to seal exhibit 1 to Plaintiff's complaint as it contains personal information. The document shall be maintained under seal until further order of the Court. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Hector Arevalo Carrasco. (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/04/24). (jj, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Hector Arevalo Carrasco for attorney representation. (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/04/24). (jj, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Hector Arevalo Carrasco for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/04/24). (jj, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/04/24). (jj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Hector Arevalo Carrasco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/04/24).(jj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
