Rybicki v. O'Malley
| John Rybicki |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv03214 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| M David Weisman |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TRANSFERRED the case record to the Western Division 24cv50228. (jp, ) |
| Filing 12 DIVISIONAL TRANSFER Notice. Case transferred to Western Division - Rockford. Pursuant to transfer order: #11 . (jh, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This has was inadvertently transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division rather than the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division, forthwith. Mailed notice (ao, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Weisman. The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's opening brief is due 30 days from the date the administrative record is filed, defendant's response is due 30 days thereafter, and plaintiff's reply is due 14 days after the response is filed. The Commissioner does not have to provide chambers with a paper copy of the administrative record unless the Court specifically requests it. Mailed notice (ao, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: CONSENT REASSIGNMENT of case to the Honorable M. David Weisman, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (rp, ) |
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Flannery, Kathleen) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Kathleen Marie Flannery as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin O'Malley (Flannery, Kathleen) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to pay the costs and fees associated with filing this action and thus the filing fee is waived. This matter is before the Court for review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. The parties should promptly consult with each other to determine whether they will consent to the reassignment of this case to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, they should file a joint statement of consent pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(a). Otherwise, the parties shall proceed according to the schedule set under the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g): the Commissioner shall answer within 60 days after notice of the action is given pursuant to Rule 3; Plaintiff shall file a brief for the requested relief within 30 days after the Commissioner's answer; the Commissioner shall file a response brief within 30 days of the Plaintiff's brief; and Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of the Commissioner's response. The matter will then be taken under advisement for ruling based on the briefing. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED Local Rule 83.15 to plaintiff. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 4 RECEIVED from Iowa Southern; Case Number 4:24-cv-00136 (nsf,) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to plaintiff. (nsf, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (nsf, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. Case electronically transferred to Northern District of Illinois, Western Division. (btg) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 4/22/2024.] |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to Transfer for Improper Venue. See Order for details. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at address listed on docket by Chambers. Signed by Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 4/17/2024. (mne) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 4/22/2024.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Rybicki. (nla) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 4/22/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by John Rybicki. (nla) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 4/22/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
