Watson v. O'Malley
Jenifer Watson |
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley |
1:2024cv03220 |
April 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John J Tharp |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Upon further review, the "joint consent" filed in this case #9 lacks the plaintiff's signature. To effect the transfer of this case to the Magistrate Judge, the plaintiff must sign the consent form or otherwise confirm consent to the Magistrate Judge's exercise of jurisdiction in this matter. Mailed notice (air, ) |
Filing 11 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Martin J O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Winston, Paraisia) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The parties having filed a joint consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge #9 , and pursuant to LR 73.1(d), the Clerk is directed to reassign this case to Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Brown, James) |
Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Paraisia Rene Winston as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Winston, Paraisia) |
Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by Jenifer Watson. (aee, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If the parties wish to consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge, a signed consent form should be filed promptly. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 4/25/2024. Mailed notice (aee, ) |
Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (vkm, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (vkm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (vkm, ) Modified on 4/23/2024 (vkm, ). |
Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jenifer Watson by James P. Brown (Brown, James) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Jenifer Watson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Brown, James) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Jenifer Watson; (Brown, James) Modified on 4/23/2024 (aee, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.