Singh, et al. v. Mayorkas, et al.
| JASWINDER SINGH, RUPINDER KAUR, BAWANDEEP KAUR and ABHAYJEET SINGH |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM, MERRICK B GARLAND, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim, Merrick B. Garland and US Attorney Office-Northern District of Illinois |
| 1:2024cv03225 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAWANDEEP KAUR, RUPINDER KAUR, ABHAYJEET SINGH, JASWINDER SINGH as to US Attorney Office-Northern District of Illinois served on 5/7/2024, answer due 7/8/2024 (Fenny, Tamunotonte) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAWANDEEP KAUR, RUPINDER KAUR, ABHAYJEET SINGH, JASWINDER SINGH as to Ur M Jaddou served on 5/3/2024, answer due 7/2/2024; Ted H Kim served on 5/3/2024, answer due 7/2/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/3/2024, answer due 7/2/2024 (Fenny, Tamunotonte) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAWANDEEP KAUR, RUPINDER KAUR, ABHAYJEET SINGH, JASWINDER SINGH as to Merrick B. Garland served on 5/7/2024, answer due 7/8/2024 (Fenny, Tamunotonte) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants MERRICK B GARLAND, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM, Alejandro Mayorkas (Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants MERRICK B GARLAND, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM, Alejandro Mayorkas (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 6/24/24, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' If defendants have not entered appearances or been served, plaintiff must file a status report advising the court of the status of service of process or any communication with defendants. Notices Mailed. (psm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jmv, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (vkm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (vkm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by BAWANDEEP KAUR, RUPINDER KAUR, ABHAYJEET SINGH, JASWINDER SINGH; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21883602. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Fenny, Tamunotonte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
