Bennett v. Cooper et al
| Roosevelt Bennett |
| Jerri Cooper, Marin Share, Dawn R., Ryan B., Mary Haymarket and Tom Dart |
| 1:2024cv03549 |
| May 1, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 LETTER from Plaintiff Roosevelt Bennett dated 06/01/2024. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 06/06/2024) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 06/11/2024) (rc, ) |
| Filing 6 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (exr, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: As explained in the attached Statement that accompanies this order, Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 1) is dismissed with prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiff's failure to disclose his litigation history and that at least three of his previously-filed cases were dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted (commonly referred to as "three strikes"). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Having brought this action, Plaintiff still remains obligated to pay the full $405 filing fee, 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), as well as all outstanding filing fees. See Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 859 (7th Cir. 1999). Enter separate final judgment order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/3/2024. Mailed notice. (exr, )
|
| Filing 4 MAIL RETURNED, for Case opening acknowledgement letter sent to Roosevelt Bennett returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to Roosevelt Bennett Joliet Treatment Center N01181 2848 West McDonough Joliet, IL 60436 (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 05/21/2024) (vjd, ) |
| Filing 3 MAIL RETURNED, for document # sent to Roosevelt Bennett returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to Joliet Treatment Center, 2848 West McDonough Joliet, IL 60436. (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 05/21/2024.) (jxm, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Roosevelt Bennett. (rc, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 05/01/2024) (rc, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Roosevelt Bennett. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 04/25/2024) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 05/01/2024) (rc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Civil Direct Assignment). (rc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.