Harris v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
Zola Harris |
SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Luster Products, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Namaste Laboratories LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC |
1:2024cv04058 |
May 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-04058 Harris v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (aee, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zola Harris by Hannah Pfeifler (Pfeifler, Hannah) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zola Harris by Jennifer Hoekstra (Hoekstra, Jennifer) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hoekstra, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Zola Harris; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21977630.(Hoekstra, Jennifer) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Direct). (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.