Thompson v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
Stanton Jeffrey Thompson |
Lead Bank, Citibank, N.A., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Merrick Bank, Capital One, N.A., Trans Union LLC and Equifax Information Services LLC |
1:2024cv04243 |
May 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #17 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), this case is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jcm) |
Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint #16 . Defendant must answer or otherwise respond by 8/5/24. Mailed notice. (jcm) |
Filing 19 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Merrick Bank (Ratledge, Michelle) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Merrick Bank(Ratledge, Michelle) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Stanton Jeffrey Thompson as to Trans Union LLC (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant Lead Bank for extension of time Defendants Lead Bank Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Castle, William) |
Filing 15 Attorney Appearance MOTION by Defendant Lead Bank for leave to appear as Attorney Appearance Attorney Appearance (Castle, William) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court grants Defendant Citibank, N.A.'s Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint #12 . On or before 08/07/2024, Defendant shall file an answer or other pleading. Mailed notice. (jcm) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Citibank, N.A. by Lucia Nale (Nale, Lucia) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Citibank, N.A. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Defendant Citibank, N.A.'s Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint) (Comstock, Christopher) |
Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Citibank, N.A. (Comstock, Christopher) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Citibank, N.A. by Christopher Steven Comstock (Comstock, Christopher) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanton Jeffrey Thompson as to Lead Bank on 6/17/2024, answer due 7/8/2024. (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanton Jeffrey Thompson as to Trans Union LLC on 6/20/2024, answer due 7/11/2024. (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Merrick Bank by Michelle R. Ratledge (Ratledge, Michelle) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanton Jeffrey Thompson as to Citibank, N.A. on 6/17/2024, answer due 7/8/2024. (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanton Jeffrey Thompson as to Merrick Bank on 6/17/2024, answer due 7/8/2024. (Gomez, Octavio) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Capital One, N.A., Citibank, N.A., Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Lead Bank, Merrick Bank, Trans Union LLC (jb, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 8/7/2024, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Notices Mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Stanton Jeffrey Thompson by Octavio Gomez (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Stanton Jeffrey Thompson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22004660.(Gomez, Octavio) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category Two). (lw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.