Katz v. Klein
| Eugene Katz |
| Annette Klein |
| 1:2024cv05021 |
| June 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time to answer #7 is granted. Defendant is to file her responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's complaint by 8/30/2024. The 8/27/2024 joint status report deadline is extended to 9/13/2024. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Annette Klein for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Unopposed) (Handler, Joel) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Annette Klein by Joel F. Handler (Special & Limited) (Handler, Joel) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene Katz as to Annette Klein on 7/16/2024, answer due 8/6/2024. (Blonder, Steven) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION RETURN OF SERVICE by Eugene Katz (Blonder, Steven) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Annette Klein. (evw) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 8/27/2024, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (evw, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blonder, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Eugene Katz; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22152295.(Blonder, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Katz v. Klein | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene Katz | |
| Represented By: | Steven P. Blonder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Annette Klein | |
| Represented By: | Joel F. Handler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
