Campbell v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
Lesa Campbell |
House of Cheatham LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation,, Strength of Nature, LLC,, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal Products, Inc., Revlon Group Holdings LLC,, Revlon, Inc. and Namaste Laboratories LLC, |
1:2024cv05675 |
July 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Revlon defendants only (Shaw, Shakuwra) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Direct). (mcp, ) |
Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:24-cv-05675 Campbell v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060) (lm, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lesa Campbell by Shakuwra Shaw (Shaw, Shakuwra) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Shaw, Shakuwra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lesa Campbell; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22213627.(Shaw, Shakuwra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.