Markel American Insurance Company v. Sanford Schmidt et al
Markel American Insurance Company |
SANFORD SCHMIDT, SCHMIDT ADVISORY SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CATALYST WEALTH MANAGEMENT, an Illinois corporation, SCHMIDT FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, ETHAN SCHMIDT and JORDAN SCHMIDT |
1:2024cv07052 |
August 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Markel American Insurance Company by Sarah Hertz Maisel (Maisel, Sarah) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Markel American Insurance Company by Simone Elise Haugen (Haugen, Simone) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Markel American Insurance Company by Daniel Richard Formeller (Formeller, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Markel American Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22347984. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Supplement Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement)(Formeller, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.