Whitley v. AFAM Concept Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
| Virginia Whitley |
| AFAM Concept Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Namaste Laboratories, LLC, SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, SoftSheen-Carson (W.I.), Inc., House of Cheatham, LLC., Dudley Beauty Corp, LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC,, L'Oreal USA, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc, John Paul Mitchell Systems, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, Luster Products, Inc., and Dabur International, Ltd. |
| 1:2024cv07110 |
| August 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-07110 Whitley v. AFAM Concept Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (mcp, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virginia Whitley by Navan Ward, Jr (Ward, Navan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ward, Navan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Virginia Whitley; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22353063.(Ward, Navan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
