Mireh v. Jaddou et al
| Radwan Mireh |
| Ur Jaddou and Kenneth Madsen |
| 1:2024cv07181 |
| August 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The Court has reviewed the parties' joint status report. The telephonic status hearing set for 10/16/2024 is vacated and reset to 11/19/2024 at 9:15 AM, using the following call-in number: 650-479-3207, access code 2305-915-8729. A joint status report in conformity with the Court's initial order is to be filed on 11/12/2024. (mk) |
| Filing 7 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Radwan Mireh (Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 10/9/2024, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 10/16/2024 at 9:05 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 650-479-3207, access code 2305-915-8729. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen (Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen (Oswald, Craig) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (lcd, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (man, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (man, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Radwan Mireh by Matthew Scott Kriezelman (Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Radwan Mireh; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22358815.(Kriezelman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
