Dye v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
Gloria A. Dye |
Strength of Nature, LLC, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, Luster Products, Inc. and Namaste Laboratories LLC |
1:2024cv07270 |
August 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-07270 Dye v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (aee, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gloria A. Dye by Jennifer Hoekstra (Hoekstra, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gloria A. Dye by Hannah Pfeifler (Pfeifler, Hannah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hoekstra, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gloria A. Dye; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22365695.(Hoekstra, Jennifer) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (man, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.