Wachter v. Monti
| Marc Wachter |
| Daniel Monti, Warden, Centralia Correctional Center |
| 1:2024cv07305 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Daniel Monti, Warden, Centralia Correctional Center by Rachel Miklaszewski (Miklaszewski, Rachel) |
| MAILED Order #5 dated 9/20/2024 to Petitioner. (gel, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the habeas corpus petition #1 by October 31, 2024, and Petitioner shall file any reply by November 20, 2024. The Clerk shall: (1) terminate Respondent Centralia Correctional Center; (2) add Petitioner's present custodian, Daniel Monti, Warden, Centralia Correctional Center, as Respondent; and (3) alter the case caption to Wachter v. Monti. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 9/20/2024. (See Order for Further Details). Emailed notice (yt) Modified on 9/26/2024 (gel, ).
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of Law by Marc Wachter (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 08/15/2024) (Envelope not postmarked) (Exhibit) (smb, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (smb, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Marc Wachter against Centralia Correctional Center (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 08/15/2024) (Exhibits) (Envelope not postmarked) (smb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (smb, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wachter v. Monti | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marc Wachter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel Monti, Warden, Centralia Correctional Center | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Miklaszewski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
