Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. Parthimpex
| Pink Floyd (1987) Limited |
| Parthimpex |
| 1:2024cv07323 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| LaShonda A Hunt |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal #9 , this action is being dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions and deadlines are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint #7 was not accompanied by the required notice of presentment. As a one-time courtesy, the Court will consider and grant the motion #7 . Defendant's response to the complaint is due by 10/17/24. For future reference, non-compliant motions may be stricken. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Parthimpex for extension of time to file answer regarding amended complaint #3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email requesting extension)(Jones, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Parthimpex by Patrick M Jones (Jones, Patrick) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The parties are ordered to file a Joint Initial Status Report for New Case by 10/30/24. A template for the report can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage under "Initial Status Conference and Status Report." A telephonic initial status hearing is set for 11/7/24 at 9:30AM. Attorneys/parties may appear by dialing: 1-650-479-3207 and entering access code: 2311 499 1046. No attendee code is required. Please review in advance the policies governing telephonic hearings that can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage on the court website. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT regarding #3 of Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22439004. (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED complaint by Pink Floyd (1987) Limited against Parthimpex (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been severed from the case of Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 3279 (N.D. Ill) (Pacold, J.) and assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. The Court adopts the previously set deadlines to pay the filing fee and file an amended complaint. See No. 24 C 3279, Dkt. 45. Plaintiff Pink Floyd (1987) Limited must pay the filing fee and file an amended complaint by 9/5/24. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) |
Filing 1
ORDER in 24cv3279: Plaintiff's motion to sever defendant Parthimpex, 41 , is granted. The court requests that the Clerk of Court open a separate lawsuit for plaintiff against Defendant No. 186, Parthimpex, and assign a new case number to that case. Once plaintiff's claim against defendant Parthimpex is severed into a separate case, if plaintiff wishes to proceed on its claim, plaintiff will pay the filing fee and file an amended complaint in the new case within 21 days of the opening of the new case. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 8/15/2024. Mailed notice (jxm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
