Storrs v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
| Crystal Storrs |
| Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Avlon Industries, SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, L'Oreal USA, Inc., MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Luster Products, Inc. and AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv09163 |
| September 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-09163 Storrs v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (jcc, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Crystal Storrs by Darsey Lee Glean (Glean, Darsey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Crystal Storrs; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22537209. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Glean, Darsey) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (vjd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
