Romero v. Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC et al
| Ivan Romero |
| Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC and Local 731, I.B.of T |
| 1:2024cv09454 |
| October 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Attorney Appearance Form by Local 731, I.B.of T (Newport, Pamela) |
| Filing 12 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC (Stein, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by David Joseph Stein for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, #10 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 12/10/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Stein, David) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendants Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC, Local 731, I.B.of T for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint, #1 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Stein, David) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC by David Joseph Stein (Stein, David) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC by Conor G. Higgins (Higgins, Conor) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ivan Romero by Michael Paul Persoon (Persoon, Michael) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ivan Romero. Lakeshore Recycling Systems, LLC waiver sent on 10/8/2024, answer due 12/9/2024. (Bloom, Willem) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ivan Romero. Local 731, I.B.of T waiver sent on 10/4/2024, answer due 12/3/2024. (Bloom, Willem) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ivan Romero by Willem Watson Bloom (Bloom, Willem) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ivan Romero by Thomas Howard Geoghegan (Geoghegan, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial telephonic status conference in this matter is set for 12/10/2024 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' website and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 12/3/2024. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ivan Romero; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22559282. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A. LOTO Slides, #3 Exhibit B. CBA Excerpt, #4 Errata C. Grievance Report)(Bloom, Willem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
